Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 02:55

Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Invitation from Google hints at earlier than expected Pixel 10 release - PhoneArena
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Mauricio Pochettino on Absent Christian Pulisic: 'Players Cannot Dictate the Plan' - FOX Sports
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Cleveland issues public health alert after spike in COVID-19 detected in wastewater - Cleveland.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
2025 NCAA baseball bracket: Men's College World Series scores, schedule - NCAA.com
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Do you like to wear a see-through skirt?
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
'Club World Ca$h Grab': Players don protest shirts at pregame - Sounder at Heart